|
Post by Ymbert Montgomery on Sept 19, 2020 2:23:23 GMT
Liminal En Garde Revised Rulebook 1.3.pdf (982.6 KB) New draft! Not a lot of major changes here and the ones there are like mistress influence are already discussed. Decided to go with the Sun King Mistress influence levels. It works out better for most of you and gives Hulluame a special advantage from the fact his soon to be wife is going to hit SL 19! Solidified Doctor/Advocate & Musician rules. Few changes I'm happy for feedback on; I'm not massively attached to them but they made sense to me. Those on campaign now pay housing and draft/racehorse costs as well as mistress upkeep. This just made more sense to me. You wouldn't let your mansion fall into disrepute. Confirmed that many academic courses are three weeks in one go. This has always been a bit vague, but it's now official to standardise things! (Yes, this means students may take a SP hit, which I think works in term of the design goal of getting people to try and have too much to do rather than to little. But if people think that's overly harsh say so!)
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 26, 2020 2:55:38 GMT
Chapter 12 (influence and bribes) is duplicated (except for tables)
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 28, 2020 11:18:02 GMT
Some more questions:
In Royal Balls, it's said prople is allowed to attend them even if they have already attended court all the weeks allowed.
So, Huillaume, either as a Baron or as a Captain of the guards, can attend the court twice a month, as the balls don't count, could he attend the three balls (being at Toulleries, the King's ban does not affect him)?
Also, Chevaliers may only attend as guests of a higher noble. Can such a noble bring more than a single Chevalier as guests (there are currently 4 chevaliers among the PCs, though one is at front, Could Huillaume invite them all or only one)?
Do players that will be formally given the title of chevalier on the 3rd week count already as Chevlaiers for the ball on the 1st week?
You told about raising the immunity to drunkness fro mthe Royal Balls and private parties and balls, yet in the new rules it is still there. Did you change your mind, or did you forgot to change it?
|
|
|
Post by Ymbert Montgomery on Sept 28, 2020 13:25:44 GMT
Some more questions: In Royal Balls, it's said prople is allowed to attend them even if they have already attended court all the weeks allowed. So, Huillaume, either as a Baron or as a Captain of the guards, can attend the court twice a month, as the balls don't count, could he attend the three balls (being at Toulleries, the King's ban does not affect him)? Correct. Only one who must toady to you the entire time. However, I'm going to change the just spotted rule in 34.4. You can now bring your mistress and a guest (who can bring their mistress). Yes. Forgot to change it. You can now get drunk.
|
|
|
Post by Jacques Bougiedure on Sept 28, 2020 14:33:45 GMT
I probably missed it in the rules but am I to understand that Chevaliers are not allowed to attend Royal Balls?
I assume that they are permitted to attend their own titling ceremony.
|
|
|
Post by Father William Souris on Sept 28, 2020 14:39:58 GMT
Chevaliers may only attend as the guest of a higher ranked Noble.
Presumaby the King counts? (As he is going to look a little... confused... if the new Chevalier is not there!)
|
|
|
Post by Father William Souris on Sept 28, 2020 14:42:33 GMT
Rules Say:
The following characters are eligible to attend court.
Any character who is being given a formal title is obviously eligible to attend for that event.
Titled nobles above Chevaliers may attend for Noble Rank minus 1 weeks.
Chevaliers may only attend as the guest of a higher ranked Noble.
Bishops and higher may attend for(Clerical Rank minus 5) weeks.
Ensigns of a Guards Regiment may attend Court one week. Captains may attend two weeks.
National Heroes (any recipient of the Legion d'Honneur or L'Etoile de France) may attend 1 Week a month.
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 28, 2020 14:57:36 GMT
Carriages:
As rules for them have changed, I guess the fine coach Huillaume purchased some time ago is now a 2 horsed carriage. Right?
IMHO, as other PCs may have coaches too, the equivalency should be specified...
|
|
|
Post by Ymbert Montgomery on Sept 28, 2020 15:09:24 GMT
Carriages: As rules for them have changed, I guess the fine coach Huillaume purchased some time ago is now a 2 horsed carriage. Right? IMHO, as other PCs may have coaches too, the equivalency should be specified... Confused by this as Fine Coaches are still in the rules. Are you looking at an old version of the rulebook?
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 28, 2020 15:22:02 GMT
It seems so, as I download them again and you're right (though the ones read before were also labeled as 1.2)
Are there serveral Liminal rules 1.2?
Then, how many people can a fine coach accomodate?
|
|
|
Post by Jacques Bougiedure on Sept 28, 2020 15:24:54 GMT
This is starting to remind me of a discussion about how warp engines operate in a PbF games of Star Trek I run. 😊
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 28, 2020 15:25:30 GMT
Oh, I see, I confused Liminal Rules Revised Rulebook 1.2 with Liminal House Rules 1.2...
|
|
|
Post by Ymbert Montgomery on Sept 28, 2020 15:26:02 GMT
It seems so, as I download them again and you're right (though the ones read before were also labeled as 1.2) Are there serveral Liminal rules 1.2? Then, how many people can a fine coach accomodate? "Liminal En Garde House Rules 1.2" are the out of date ones. "Liminal En Garde Revised Rulebook 1.2" is the right one! And that's a very good question. I think we'll say four people for any coach; it's not really the done thing to treat it as a commerical stagecoach after all!
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Sept 28, 2020 17:19:56 GMT
This is starting to remind me of a discussion about how warp engines operate in a PbF games of Star Trek I run. 😊 If the question was about the physical principles the warp drives operato on, it's quite easy to answer: "They work on (put here a scientific name) effect, discovered by the scientific who gives name to it in 22 nd century (so, asking about it now would be as asking Newton under what principle a Fision Power Plant works). If (s)he does not understand the question is not pertinent, you should wonder if (s)he deserves keep investing your time... But if the questions were about the game mechanics and effects to treat with them, the question was fully pertinent, IMHO
|
|
|
Post by huillaume on Nov 12, 2020 18:02:48 GMT
Can one bet at the horses race if he does not attend it (assuming though some intermediary)?
|
|